|
|
Post by hoohingd1 on Oct 12, 2009 7:56:04 GMT -5
I that they should not place stiff controls on goods that compete with U.S. trades because this would cause many problems with the U.S. trade system which includes many other countries. Many of the countries would not like the change of the trade which will eventually stop. Therefore the U.S will lose money and not recieve goods that they used to recieve from other countries.
|
|
|
|
Post by maysr1 on Oct 12, 2009 7:56:45 GMT -5
i believe that u.s should place stiff controls on imporst and goods because of the exporting of american jobs. If their are tariffs, than it would help jobs in the US because people would start buying their own products and businesses would start doing better. with that being said since the US imports from more than 180 countries than having the tariffs would be a bad thing because the goods would cost more for the people. this may result in consumers not buying foreign products which could eventually conclude in a disastrous economy..
|
|
|
|
Post by witherspoonc1 on Oct 12, 2009 8:03:36 GMT -5
Placing stiff controls on imports of goods would not probably be a success because it can effect the trade we have with the other countries. Therefore we wouldnt have as many goods being imported into the U.S. because it also can effect the relationship we have with them also.
|
|
|
|
Post by alexus edwrds on Oct 12, 2009 8:03:33 GMT -5
they shouldn't place stiff controls on imports of goods to compete with businesses to prevent the "exporting of American jobs" to other countries because this would have a major effect on the people who are working in America and their would be less imported goods ???
|
|
|
|
Post by jh on Oct 13, 2009 11:34:45 GMT -5
To me it seems like it shouldn't be stiff controls on the goods. simply because America is a mainly import country. If stiff controls happen then im pretty sure the country will suffer worse beause we wont have any good that are imported from other countries such a China. And with the exporting of jobs, if someone else wants to do the work that American citizens dont want to do, let them do it.
|
|
|
|
Post by scottj6 on Oct 15, 2009 11:41:40 GMT -5
Some people believe that the US should place stiff controls on imports of goods the compete with US businesses to prevent the "exporting of American jobs" to other countries. Give arguments for and against such a position. My Argument is that the economy is bad enough as it. So globalization shouldn't take place. Giving jobs just because it's cheaper is not helping. The government should just keep paying us.
|
|
|
|
Post by jordan heard on Oct 15, 2009 11:43:06 GMT -5
PLACING STIFF CONTROLS ON IMPORTS AND EXPORTS WOULD BE GOOD FOR THE U.S. BECAUSE IT WOULD PREVENT OTHER COUNTRIES FROM PROFITING ON OUR EXPORTED AND IMPORTED GOODS.
|
|
|
|
Post by LOUISA ROBERTSON on Oct 15, 2009 11:46:37 GMT -5
PLACING STIFF CONTROL ON TRADE CAN BE HARMFUL TO THE ECONOMY BECAUSE WE RELY ON IMPORTS. IF WE HAVE NO COMPETITION THEN WE WILL BE WORKING HARD FOR NOTHING AND WE'LL BE EXHAUSTED
|
|
|
|
Post by ballt6 on Oct 15, 2009 11:49:53 GMT -5
putting stiff controls on imported good would hurt the US. prices would rise on imported goods so consumers would buy less.
|
|
|
|
Post by sandersond6 on Oct 15, 2009 17:39:45 GMT -5
For: Putting stiff control over the imports of goods would greatly affect the competition between national businesses.
Against: Although it couldn't be beneficial due to the economical damage of importing over exporting. The other country has to find another area to import the goods.
|
|
|
|
Post by hollandk6 on Oct 18, 2009 21:35:27 GMT -5
The issue is mainly protection and protection trade policies. Stiff controls over imports and exports is essential for the U.S. in order for us to gain profit & to keep our jobs/careers.
Exporting jobs is a natural occurance of going from a manufacturing economy to an information economy.
|
|
|
|
Post by collins1 on Oct 21, 2009 10:28:02 GMT -5
I believe that the US should not place stiff controls on imports of goods the compete with US business to prevent the exporting of American jobs to other countries. because it will make us lose more of our jobs and we will also have less imports because other countries are using things that the US has.
|
|
|
|
Post by s08143083 on Oct 21, 2009 10:32:46 GMT -5
they should place stiff control on import of goods because if they import too much good the country would depend on them to keep sending goods. even though it is good for the economy it may also be bad for it later. also i dont think that they should compete with other U.S businesses to prevent the exporting of american jobs to other country because doing that develop the businesses and if the businesses are developing they would want to hire more people. and the GDP would increase.
|
|
|
|
Post by scantlingw1 on Oct 22, 2009 6:51:44 GMT -5
I disagree with US having to place stiff controls on imports of goods even if it competes with US businesses to prevent "export of American jobs' to other countries. Globalization shouldn't take place. Giving jobs just because it's cheaper is not helping. They should be helping our people not hindering us.
|
|
|
|
Post by Paula on Jan 25, 2021 20:51:04 GMT -5
I'm extremely impressed together with your writing skills as well as with thhe structure to your blog. Is that this a paid subject matter or did you modify it yourself? Anyway ksep up the excellent quality writing, it is rare to see a great eblog like this one these days.. www.designspiration.com/curtisreyes137/custom paper writing service custom pzper writing service |
|
